Showing posts with label stocks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stocks. Show all posts

Ideas on how to become rich: The Dividends Issue, part 3!

Ideas on how to become rich: The Dividends Issue, part 3!

In the earlier two posts, I wrote about dividends and discussed the general idea of whether dividends would be able to make one rich. You can read about the discussion on dividend stocks in the earlier two posts here on this site. 

In this third part, I write about a counterargument to dividends, which I will expand on in the next series on my site here. The counterargument is, of course, quite naturally - a growth strategy focusing on capital gains. 

OK, when it comes to stocks, there are of course many approaches as we have seen already - technical analysis, fundamental analysis, and so on. In this series, I was looking at dividend plays. So here is the counterargument. Dividend plays may not be as good as a purely capital gains strategy. 

Some of the really astute investors note that a capital gains strategy is not necessarily at odds with a dividend play. That's true. That's because sometimes you can find a stock that delivers quite a good gain over time in capital appreciation, while also giving out a good and reliable dividend. However, that kind of stock is quite rare. In fact, usually the stocks that are needed for a capital gains strategy are those that are riskier and usually give no dividends whatsoever. 

The key point to note here is that capital gains are the way you get the huge capital base in the first case, if you are not already a high income earner, to pursue a purely dividend strategy! That is the rub. This means that if you are rich already, then using a purely dividend strategy where you reinvest dividends regularly would definitely work. However, for most of us, we do not have the sizable capital base in the first case, and therefore it would logically mean that a capital gains strategy would be the most appropriate strategy for us in the first case!

In the next post, I will be talking about the pros and cons of a purely capital gains strategy - and more on stocks and other favourite hot topics of mine (and yours too, presumably since you're reading this). Thanks for reading and cheers!

Ideas on how to become rich

Ideas on how to become rich: The Dividends Issue, part 2

Ideas on how to become rich: The Dividends Issue, part 2

I wrote a short investment piece on dividends in my last article. Here you go if you're interested in what I've written earlier on the topic: The Dividends Issue.

The difference between theory and practice in investment is what I will be examining today. Let's look at a few simple reasons why a pure dividend investment strategy won't work - or more accurately might not work - in practice. If we can find stocks that give out high dividend regularly and can pay somehow a very low price for them, then sit back and let the dividend come in to provide income for further reinvestment, then this system would really work. Compounding would set in fairly rapidly. However, in practice in investment things don't work this way.

First, we have to consider that the price of the stock might be higher than expected already due to the fact that this company gives out high dividends, and people know this.

Second, it is highly unlikely that the stock in question will rise much further since it is a consistent dividend giver and not a growth company. Therefore, a pure dividend strategy is highly unlikely to work if one thinks one can make money on capital gains.

Third, dividends in Singapore and in many other countries are - at most - given out four times a year, and at the least, assuming they give out anything at all, once a year. And this dividend can be cut at any point on time a recession or financial crisis hits, mind you. Thus, a pure dividend investment  strategy can help you become rich only when you're already rich. For those on the way there, a mixed investment strategy is more useful, I'd say.

Thanks for reading and cheers!

Short notice:

I myself don't like gambling or speculating - I like investing. However, I might consider writing about ways people have come up with to try to make money via gambling since there is a recent craze at MBS (Marina Bay Sands) Singapore where the casinos are. Even a group of Malaysian teachers in early 2011 went to the casino instead of taking care of their charges! What a craze. Is there or is there not a system to defeat the casino and make lots of money? We might find out in a future post! Thanks for reading and cheers.

Ideas on how to become rich!

Ideas on How To Become Rich - The Dividends Issue


Ideas on How To Become Rich - The Dividends Issue

I was surfing the net when I came across an investment blog dedicated to helping people learn about investing based entirely upon dividends. The author was arguing that one way of getting rich - definitely getting rich - was by having dividends accrue over time. He seemed to be arguing also that capital gains cannot be relied upon because of the famous EMH (if you didn't know what that was, it's the very famous and very falsified Efficient Market Hypothesis). I must say that I have a more than passing interest in the subject of investment, so here I am to give some opinions on dividend investing.



Can investing in dividend paying companies really make one rich? 

The investment literature is divided on this one, with some arguing yes and some saying no, so let's not look at that.



Let's look at the logic.

If dividends were 10% a year, and one merely reinvested dividends year after year in companies that paid the same percentage of dividends, this would be one great idea. It's definitely workable in investment theory.



But this assumes that inflation is low, taxes on the dividends are low or nonexistent, and certainly alsoassumes that you can always find companies that pay 10% dividend. I am a sporting person and would be willing to say that this is not possible (to consistently find high paying dividend stocks). In fact, it is hard enough as it is finding companies that pay dividends consistently. 

Aha, some people say, in investment you can always find companies that have consistently paid dividends over the years. Some call them dividend kings, others call them aristocrats of the stock market, others call them Coca Cola, bla bla bla. Yes, that seems workable and that seems true. 



But the issue is that if they are that reliable and always pay dividends, then the stock price would most likely reflect this.... which means that their payout rate has to be low, i.e. less than 5%, say 3-4%? The prices would reflect this high dividend payout. The rest is purely mathematical, with higher prices meaning that even high payouts have a low percentage return.

I have no reliable statistics on this. One Singaporean stock market site goes 8% in the long term but remember this is driving by the rear view mirror. As my favourite investor Buffet says, if all there was to stock picking is past performance, then the best investors would be librarians! Something like that; I am paraphrasing from memory and from impression.

So.... I'd say that dividends can make you have a regular income, and can discipline savings. Those are good things. This is because you regularly get a paycheck and you can be disciplined enough to reinvest and reinvest your dividends, in order to get compounding to work for you. Those are indeed good things.

BUT it is highly unlikely that a pure dividend investment strategy would work. Perhaps one can try a growth strategy that also pays minimal dividends.... you would be happy to wait for the growth whilst holding on to at least some small returns. A mixed investment strategy would definitely pay off better in the search to become rich rather than a fixation on dividend paying stocks.



This investment topic is quite complicated, so I will come back to it in a second post, on why dividend stocks may not grow as fast as growth stocks. Stay here with me; thanks for reading and cheers!



Ideas on how to become rich - today's topic: dividends

Fundamental Analysis basics 2


How to do a sample fundamental analysis

Even though there is no one clear-cut method to fundamental analysis, here is one suggestion by Stock Charts, which I like very much. It is methodical, standard, and accounts for most of the variables that we need to know. At the same time, it is important to try to develop some system that works for you, and also, it is good to keep in mind that we may want to see how Warren Buffett does his approach as well, to gather more perspectives on investment and how to make money.

This fundamental analysis method (it is only a suggestion of how you could possibly do this analysis) employs a methodical, top-down approach that starts with the overall economy, and then works down to specific industry groups, and finally to specific companies. Industry groups are compared against other industry groups and companies against other companies to ensure a fair comparison, and usually, companies are compared with others in the same group.

First and of highest importance in a top-down approach would be an overall evaluation of the general economy. Basically, it is common knowledge that when the economy expands and grows, most industry groups and companies will also benefit and grow accordingly. Correspondingly, when the economy declines, most sectors and companies usually suffer accordingly as well. A rising tide lifts all boats and a tide that is going down brings down those boats as well. Many economists link economic expansion and contraction to the level of interest rates, where interest rates are seen as a leading indicator for the stock market as well. A correlation between stock prices and interest rates thus seems to exist, so you might want to take note of that here. Once a feel for the overall economy has been made, an investor can then start to divide the economy into its various industry groups.

If the prognosis is for an expanding economy, then certain industrial groups are likely to benefit more than others. This is important. An investor can narrow the field to those groups that are best-suited to benefit from current or future economic environments. If most companies are expected to benefit from an expansion in the economy, then risk in equities would be relatively low and an aggressive growth-oriented strategy (i.e. a portfolio full of stocks) might be advisable. A growth strategy here might involve the heavy purchase of technology, biotech, and even cyclical stocks. That is the best strategy to make money.

If, however, the economy is forecasted to contract, an investor may opt for a more conservative strategy and seek out stable income-oriented companies. A defensive strategy might involve the purchase of companies that give out dividends instead of focusing on growth, consumer staples, utilities and energy-related stocks, for instance.

To assess an industry group's potential, an investor would want to consider the overall growth rate, market size, and importance of this particular group to the economy. While the individual company is important, its industry group is likely to exert as much, or more, influence on the stock price. When stocks move, apparently they usually move as groups. Many times, it is more important to be in the right industry than in the right stock if you want to make a lot of money!

Once the industry group is chosen, an investor would need to narrow the list of companies before proceeding to a more detailed analysis. Investors are usually interested in finding the leaders and the innovators in a group. The first task is to identify the current business and competitive environment in a group as well as future trends. One needs to look at market share, product position and competitive advantage? What are the barriers to entry? Who is the current leader and how will changes within the sector affect the current balance of power? Success depends on an edge, be it marketing, market share, technology or innovation. A analysis of the competition within a sector will help identify companies with a key competitive edge and most likely to keep it. An investor might analyze the resources and capabilities within each company to identify those companies that are capable of creating and maintaining a competitive advantage. The analysis could focus on selecting companies with a sensible business plan, solid management and sound financials (which we will look at in the next post on financial reports).

The business plan forms the basis for analysis. If the plan, model or concepts are poor, there is little hope here for the business. For a new business, the questions may be these here: Does its business make sense? Is there a market? Can a profit be made? Or more obviously, can the company make a lot of money or not? For an established business, the questions may be: Is the company's direction clearly defined? Is the company a leader in the market? Can the company maintain leadership?

In order to execute a business plan, again here a company requires top-quality management. Investors might look at management to assess their capabilities, strengths and weaknesses here. Even the best ideas and plans in the most dynamic industries can go to waste with bad management. Alternatively, even strong management can make for extraordinary success in a mature industry. Again, here some of the questions to ask might include: How talented is the management team? Do they have a track record? Can management deliver on its promises? If management is a problem, here it is best not to buy such stocks.

The final step to this analysis process would be to take apart the financial statements and come up with a means of valuation. In another section, in this blog, I will try to discuss and give ideas on how to read and analyse annual reports.

After all is said and done, again an investor will be left with a handful of companies that stand out from the pack. Over the course of the fundamental analysis, some companies will definitely stand out as potential leaders and innovators here. In addition, other companies would be considered laggards, poor companies, and very unpredictable. The final step of the fundamental analysis process is to synthesize all the available data, analysis and understanding into actual stock picks, and buy accordingly.


It is important to note that fundamental analysis is very valuable, but it should be approached with caution. We all have personal biases, and every analyst who writes reports on companies has some sort of bias. There is nothing wrong with this, and the research can still be of great value, but it is something that you should be aware of. Learn what the ratings actually mean and the track record of an analyst before investing your hard-earned money. Remember the ultimate goal is to make money. Corporate statements and press releases offer good information, but they should be read with a healthy degree of skepticism to separate the facts from the spin. Press releases don't happen by accident; they are an important PR tool for companies. Reading press releases, annual reports, investment books are all important! Investors should become skilled readers to weed out the important information and ignore the hype. In other posts on this blog, we will examine the basics on how to read and analyse annual reports, as they are integral to investment. Stay tuned for further posts!

Investment: Technical Analysis basics 5


Introduction to Trends

Technical analysis is based on the assumption that prices follow a trend. Trend lines are hereby important for trend identification and confirmation. A trend line is a straight line that connects two or more price points and extends into the future to act as a line of support or resistance.

An uptrend line has a positive gradient and is formed by connecting two or more low points. Uptrend lines act as support and indicate that net demand is increasing even as the price rises. A rising price combined with increasing demand is very bullish, and shows strong determination on the part of buyers. As long as prices remain above the trend line, the uptrend is considered intact. A break below the uptrend line indicates that net demand has weakened and a change in trend could be imminent.

A downtrend line has a negative gradient and is formed by connecting two or more high price points. Downtrend lines act as resistance, and indicate that net supply is increasing even as the price declines. A declining price combined with increasing supply is very bearish, and shows strong resolve of sellers. As long as prices remain below the downtrend line, the downtrend is intact. A break above the downtrend line indicates that net supply is decreasing and that a change of trend could be imminent.

Again, it takes two or more points to draw a trend line. The more points used to draw the trend line, the more validity attached to the support or resistance level represented by the trend line. Even though trend lines are important to technical analysis, occasionally it is not always possible to draw trend lines on a given price chart. Sometimes the lows or highs do not match up. The general rule in technical analysis is: it takes two points to draw a trend line and a third to confirm its validity.

As the steepness of a trend line increases, the validity of the support or resistance level decreases. A steep trend line comes from either a sharp advance or decline of price over a short period of time. The angle of a trend line created from such a sharp move is unlikely to offer any meaningful interpretations. Even if the trend line is formed with three seemingly valid points, attempting to play a trend line break or to use the support and resistance level established will often prove difficult.

Sometimes there appears to be the possibility for drawing a trend line, but the exact points do not match up cleanly. The price highs or lows might be “off”, the angle might be too steep, or the points too close. If one or two points could be ignored, then a fitted trend line could be formed. With volatility present in the market, prices can over-react and produce spikes that distort highs and lows. One method for dealing with over-reactions is to draw internal trend lines, as an internal trend line ignores price spikes.

Trend lines can offer insight, but if used improperly may also produce false signals. Then again, other analyses can be employed to validate trend line breaks. While trend lines have become very popular again, they are merely one tool for establishing and confirming a trend. Trend lines should not be final, but should serve merely as a warning for changes in price trends. By using trend line breaks as warnings, investors can pay closer attention to other confirming signals.

Investing in the Stock Market to Make Money

Investing in the Stock Market

Assuming that you have some money capital, and want to become rich, there is the stock market. The stock market is one of the most consistent ways of making money if one knows how. This post will attempt to discuss how to invest in the stock market and make money, from the point of view of the Singapore stock exchange. Nonetheless, the lessons learnt are from great investors worldwide, and the lessons can be applied to every single country's exchange, with minor adapations. I myself am a fan of Warren Buffett's method of investment. Nonetheless, again, I think it's important for one to make up one's own mind and choose the approach suitable for oneself, when it comes to investing. True enough, modelling some famous investor could be useful, but "a poll is no substitute for thought"... if I remember Buffett correctly.

There are technical investors, fundamental (value) investors (of which Warren Buffett is the most famous exponent, along with his teacher Benjamin Graham), speculators, fund managers, etc. In this post and the next few, our point of focus will be on general education or ideas with respect to investment and capital appreciation. I will also recommend various models and various investors to learn from and to emulate; I'm not influencing your decisions in any way.

Anyways, these are my two recommended sites for Singaporean investors:
http://www.ses.com.sg/
http://www.poems.com.sg/

One leads to the Singapore stock exchange, and the other leads to POEMS, which is an online investment portal. Now due to modern technology, stock exchanges have gone online.

For American investors, the websites to know are:
http://www.amex.com/
http://www.nasdaq.com/
and the famous Standard and Poor's:
http://www2.standardandpoors.com/portal/site/sp/en/us/page.home/home/0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.html

More posts here to come regarding the stock market and investment principles and ideas! Once again, stay tuned...